Cryotherapy vs. Cold Plunge: The Ultimate Cold Showdown for Recovery
In the world of athletic recovery, few debates are as "chilling" as Cryotherapy vs. Cold Plunge. Both use cold to boost recovery, but their differences could be the deciding factor for your routine.
1. Temperature Differences
Cryotherapy uses temperatures as low as -165°F for short bursts (2-3.5 minutes), triggering a rapid skin response that cools the body by around 40°F. This extreme cold initiates a range of benefits, including improved circulation, cell renewal, and a detoxifying effect as blood rushes to vital organs.
​
On the other hand, cold plunges are more about endurance, lasting from 30 seconds to 15 minutes with water temperatures between 35°F and 65°F. This immersion leads to a 25°F drop, delivering targeted muscle recovery and often used in contrast therapy.
2. Comfort & Safety
Cryotherapy provides a quick, controlled cold experience without the risk of hypothermia. Cold plunges, while beneficial, may freeze muscle tissue if prolonged, making it essential to monitor time.
3. Cost Considerations
Cryotherapy sessions range from $40-$60 but can be reduced with memberships. Cold plunges are more accessible, with setup costs from $300-$5,000 for home use.
So, which suits your recovery style best?
Here is a full article breaking this down in depth: https://www.cryobuilt.com/post/cryotherapy-vs-cold-plunge-a-cold-debate#:~:text=Cryotherapy%20cunningly%20simulates%20a%20freezing,stays%20in%20for%20too%20long.